Combined live view of emotion classification and vitals for the active session.
Emotion—
HR—
SDNN—
RMSSD—
LF/HF—
Physiological Signals
Performance Analytics
Match metrics
Emotion–performance summary
Emotion
n
Avg KDA
Avg gold
Win %
Model Selection
Thesis comparison: Random Forest (87.3%), ANN (85.7%), SVM (83.1%). Select a model to use for emotion classification.
Thesis highlights
Model
Accuracy
Role
Random Forest
87.3%
Primary / best overall
Artificial Neural Network (ANN)
85.7%
Deep learning baseline
Support Vector Machine (SVM)
83.1%
RBF kernel baseline
Per-emotion (RF): Focused F1 = 0.91 (highest); Frustrated F1 = 0.78 (lowest, overlap with Stressed).
HRV and GSR features contributed most to classification performance.
Session History
ID
Player
Status
Started
Alerts
No critical alerts. Stress / GSR spikes will appear here during live sessions.
Settings
Prototype settings. Sensor simulator and RF model paths are documented in docs/WIRING.md.